Legal Opinion
Aeropower, Ltd. v. Matherly
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided January 18, 2007No. 1:03-cv-00889PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
W. KEITH WATKINS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs AeroPower, Ltd., and Kama International, Inc., successor to AeroPow er II, Ltd. (collectively “AeroPower”), bring this civil action against Defendants Steve Matherly (“Matherly”), SM & T Aircraft, Inc. (“SM & T”), Aero Records and Title Company (“Aero Records”), Sharon Shroeder (“Schroeder”), and Lori Crowell (“Crowell”) alleging claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968. (Doc. # 158, Second Am. Compl.) AeroPower also alleges various claims under Alabama state law…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tinsley v. BP Corp. North America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2015
- American Home Assurance Co. v. Weaver Aggregate Transport, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2010
- Roche Diagnostics Corporation v. Priority Healthcare CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019
- Whatley v. The Ohio National Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2019