Legal Opinion

People v. Armstrong

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 3, 1970No. Docket 6,596PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted by a jury of second-degree murder on August 20,1968, MCLA § 750.317 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.549). He appeals as of right.

On the second day of the trial, defendant expressed a desire to discharge his retained counsel because the latter “was not doing anything”. Defendant said nothing as to his intention to either obtain another attorney or to defend himself in his own proper person. Indeed, defendant’s motives for dismissal of his attorney were so nebulous that the trial court was given the impression that defendant wished to substitute another attorney. Because the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. DegraffenreidMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. People v. PayneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. People v. HenleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. BynumMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. HolcombMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. State v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  3. Quinn v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. People v. McMillanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API