Sweeney v. Boston & Maine Railroad
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtWoodbury, J.
I. The defendant operates a connecting railroad system extending into several states and the Keene branch of this system upon which the accident occurred is in daily use for the passage of cars between Keene, N. H. and Boston, Mass. The deceased at the time of his death was engaged in the work of maintaining the road bed of this Keene branch. It is now well established that an employee engaged in the work of maintaining or repairing tracks used in whole or in part for interstate commerce is entitled to the benefits of the federal employers’ liability act. Rockwell v. Hustis, 79 N. H. 57;…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Southern Railway Co. v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Wabash Railroad v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Rocco v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Thomson v. DowneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
- Hersey v. FritzSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
- Dade v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943