Legal Opinion

Smolinski v. BOSTON RETIREMENT BOARD

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 4, 1963PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.

These four bills in equity seek declarations under Gr. L. c. 231A as to the effect of Gr. L. c. 32, § 91A, inserted by St. 1958, c. 684, § 1 (approved as an initiative law in the election of November 4,1958), upon the rights of three police officers of the city of Boston and one police officer of the city of Worcester who had been retired for accidental disability (total and permanent incapacity). Two of the plaintiffs, former Boston police officers, were retired on July 1, 1939, and September 1, 1942, respectively, under St. 1922, c. 521, § 13, a special statute which established the Boston…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foley v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  2. Kinney v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  3. McCarthy v. State Board of RetirementMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  4. Roach v. State Board of RetirementMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Opinion of the JusticesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Nash v. Boise City Fire DepartmentIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Dullea v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  4. Robinson v. Teachers' Retirement BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  5. Garofoli v. Worcester Retirement BoardMassachusetts Superior Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API