Legal Opinion

Dixon v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 1988No. WD 40733PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANFORD, Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of movant’s Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant claims that his trial counsel was ineffective, and that the trial court denied him due process and a fair trial by not providing “use” immunity to certain witnesses.

The judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part.

A jury convicted movant of two counts of murder in the first degree, two counts of armed criminal action, one count of robbery in the first degree, and one count of burglary in the first degree. He was sentenced to life imprisonment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  2. State v. HolmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Scott v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Bird v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State v. MacKeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. State v. KennedyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. State v. StevensonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Dixon v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API