Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 2012No. WD 73862PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.

Ivan Johnson (“Johnson”) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion following an evidentiary hearing. Johnson alleges that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed to register a hearsay objection to the testimony of a witness about the statement of another individual regarding Johnson’s presence near the scene of a murder. Johnson claims that a timely hearsay objection would have been sustained and that the result of his trial would have been different. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural History

Johnson was convicted in 2005…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  3. Dorris v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  4. Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  5. Morrow v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Michael S. Federhofer v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. William S. Miller, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Moss v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Millet v. AdamsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API