F. D. Cummer & Son Co. v. Atlas Dryer Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
■ Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio. Suit in equity by the F. D. Cummer & Son Company against the Atlas Dryer Company and William M. Cummer. Decree for defendants, and complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
DENISON, Circuit Judge.
Suit for injunction and accounting based on claims 7, 12, 21, 23, and 28 of patent to F. D. Cummer, No. 545,120, issued August 27, 1895, application filed March 5, 1895.
[1] The patent here in suit pertains to the art of drying various materials, and particularly to that type of dryer which employs a long, inclined, rotating, metallic cylinder through which the materials pass from the higher to the lower end, being, by the rotating movement and by internally projecting blades or flanges, carried part way up the side of the cylinder and then falling or cascading off the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Herman v. Youngstown Car Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- Yale Lock Manufacturing Co. v. SargentSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- National Tube Co. v. AikenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
- Morgan Engineering Co. v. Alliance Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ensten v. Simon, Ascher & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Dunkley Co. v. Central California CanneriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Seymour v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Liquid Carbonic Co. v. Gilchrist Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
- Ensten v. Rich-Sampliner Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.