Winkler v. Interim Services, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 50). For the reasons stated herein, Defendant’s Motion is DENIED.
FACTS
Plaintiffs are elderly and disabled Medicare beneficiaries who receive home health care services from Defendant. Plaintiffs allege that they are essentially being “dumped” and abandoned by Defendant as a result of recent changes in the Medicare reimbursement rules. Plaintiffs contend that Defendant’s refusal to provide them medically necessary home health care services is based simply upon the fact that Plaintiffs are…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mayer v. MylodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Michigan State Afl-Cio v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- James Paul Doherty, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Southern College of Optometry, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. 11C MUSICDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2001