Robins v. Robins

MOSS, J.,

The issue is whether we properly granted non-party Philadelphia corporation for the aging’s (“PCA”) Motion for protective order and to quash subpoena (“PCA Motion”) in plaintiff’s absence. For the following reasons, we properly granted. Furthermore, the instant appeal should be quashed as interlocutory and not immediately appealable pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. 313(2012).

Facts and Procedural History

This is a January, 2011 non jury matter involving alleged, inter alia, wrongful use of civil process and illegal tenant eviction. See generally amended complaint, 05/16/12. Plaintiff Jonathan…