Legal Opinion

STEAM & PROCESS REPAIRS v. Cayton

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 2, 2009No. 2080529Published

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.

Steam & Process Repairs (“S & P”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment in this workers’ compensation action. In its appeal, S & P contends that the trial court erred in the way it gave credit to S & P for temporary-total-disability payments S & P made to employee Michael V. Cayton after Cayton had reached maximum medical improvement (“MMI”).

The pertinent facts are as follows. From May 22, 2004, to April 18, 2008, S & P voluntarily paid Cayton $513.54 a week in temporary-total-disability benefits for a back injury Cayton had sustained in a work-related accident.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Phenix Rental CenterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Hedgemon v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  3. FORT JAMES OPERATING CO., INC. v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  4. Gold Kist, Inc. v. MullinaxCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  5. March v. City of HuntsvilleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API