STEAM & PROCESS REPAIRS v. Cayton
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.
Steam & Process Repairs (“S & P”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment in this workers’ compensation action. In its appeal, S & P contends that the trial court erred in the way it gave credit to S & P for temporary-total-disability payments S & P made to employee Michael V. Cayton after Cayton had reached maximum medical improvement (“MMI”).
The pertinent facts are as follows. From May 22, 2004, to April 18, 2008, S & P voluntarily paid Cayton $513.54 a week in temporary-total-disability benefits for a back injury Cayton had sustained in a work-related accident.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex Parte Phenix Rental CenterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Hedgemon v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- FORT JAMES OPERATING CO., INC. v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Gold Kist, Inc. v. MullinaxCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
- March v. City of HuntsvilleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.