Legal Opinion

D.S. v. Spurwink Services, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 21, 2013No. Docket Cum-12-236PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] In this case, D.S., an incapacitated woman, has alleged that in 2004 Spur-wink Services, Inc. breached its duty of care to her by allowing her to leave the property of its education facility, which resulted in her being sexually assaulted by two strangers. We are asked to determine whether D.S.’s claims are subject to the mandatory prelitigation procedures of the Maine Health Security Act (MHSA), 24 M.R.S. §§ 2501-2987 (2012).

[¶ 2] D.S. appeals from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Cole, J.) in favor of Spurwink Services. The court entered a summary…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Musk v. NelsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  2. Saunders v. TisherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  3. Baker v. FarrandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  4. Butler v. KilloranSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  5. Dutil v. BurnsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ann Salerno v. Spectrum Medical Group, P.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  2. CARLETON v. PISCATAQUIS COUNTY JAILDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2023
  3. CARNEY v. HANCOCK COUNTY MAINEDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021
  4. DESMARAIS v. HAMILTONDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2023
  5. DYER v. PENOBSCOT COUNTYDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API