Patterson v. Mayor of Baltimore
Court of Appeals of Maryland
xlppeal from the Baltimore City Court. (Stump, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
City Ordinance Ho. 109, approved May 27th, 1912, authorized the opening -of Adams street from the west side of’ Homewood avenue to the south side of Twenty-fifth street. It provided for the opening of the street "to the south side of Twenty-fifth street 100 feet wide as now in process of widening." The opening of Twenty-fifth street had been authorized by an Ordinance No. 416, approved December 9th, 1909.
The appellants are the owners in fee of a tract of land, which extends northerly and easterly from Walbert avenue. For a clear imderstan ding of the situation of the several streets and the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Consolidated Gas Co. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
- Kurrle v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
- Tide Water Canal Co. v. ArcherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1839
- Mayor of Baltimore v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brack v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
- Bergeman v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Pumphrey v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Mayor of Baltimore v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Timanus v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.