Tide Water Canal Co. v. Archer
Court of Appeals of Maryland
The nature and circumstances of the case are fully stated by the learned judges, before whom it was tried and decided.
1Opinion of the Court
The questions now to be decided in this ease, arise upon objections filed by the Tide Water Canal Company, to the affirmance of the inquisition returned to the clerk of this court by the late John Carsins, who was at the time of the taking and of the return thereof, the sheriff of Harford county, and the same having been taken on parcels of land alleged and stated in and by said inquisition, to be owned and claimed by Mrs. Ann Archer of said county. The objections are filed under a provision in the 13th section of the act of assembly of 1825, chapter 180, entitled “ an act for the promotion…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Queen v. HepburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Hills v. MillerNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Pitcher v. LivingstonNew York Supreme Court · 1809
- Ellis v. WelchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
- Astor v. MillerNew York Court of Chancery · 1830
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brack v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
- Norris v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
- Ridgely v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
- Thomas v. Pennsylvania RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
- Smith v. Potomac Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.