Legal Opinion

Ho-Chunk, Inc. v. Jeff Sessions

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 3, 2018No. 17-5140PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge Randolph.

*366 Historically, the "Ho-Chunk" Tribe occupied portions of what are now several midwestern states. In the 1800's the Tribe entered into treaties with the United States and divided into two branches: the Ho-Chunk Nation of Wisconsin and the Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska. Both are federally-recognized Indian tribes with federal reservations. See 83 Fed. Reg. 4,235 , 4,237, 4,239 (Jan. 30, 2018).

The four appellants in this case-a parent corporation and three of its subsidiaries-are incorporated under the laws of the Winnebago Tribe of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Montana v. Blackfeet Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Nevada v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Koi Nation of N. Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  2. Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API