Whitehill v. Halbing
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBtjbpee, J.
The decisive question raised in this appeal is' whether a later will containing a clause expressly revoking all former wills, takes effect immediately and finally, so that after its destruction by the testator a former will existing at the time of his death shall not be approved and set up as his last will. In deciding this question we are governed solely by the statute of wills of this State which was enacted in 1821. That statute changed the law which had been in force before that time and under which the case of James v. Marvin, 3 Conn. 576, was reserved for the consideration of this…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hatheway v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- Blackett v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Jacobs v. ButtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Security Co. v. SnowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Stetson v. StetsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Burtt WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Ford's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Dennen v. SearleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Connecticut Junior Republic v. Sharon HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Sigal v. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.