Legal Opinion

Tartasky v. Larkin

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

The petitioner brings this proceeding, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to review an adverse determination made by the Hempstead Town Board after a public hearing. He had requested a permit to install gasoline storage tanks in accordance with the flammable materials ordinance, and to use the premises as a gasoline filling station as a special exception under section X-1.9 of article 7 of the Town Building Zone Ordinance. The petition stated that the premises would be used to maintain one 4,000-gallon, two 3,000-gallon, and one 2,000-gallon gasoline storage tanks, and also a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. Village of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Nappi, Verona v. La GuardiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Nappi v. La GuardiaNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Nappi v. La GuardiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bar Harbour Shopping Center, Inc. v. AndrewsNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Spohrer v. Town of Oyster BayNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Fusco v. Town of Oyster BayNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Glaser v. LarkinNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Ralph Peck Holding Corp. v. BurnsNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API