Legal Opinion

Cox v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. of Hartford

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 23, 1928No. Gen. No. 7,736PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jones

delivered the opinion of the court.'

This suit was instituted on a policy of insurance against loss by robbery. The maximum liability of the insurer was $20,000 and the premium was $80. The policy period extended from December 18, 1923, to December 18, 1924, and insured against loss only between the hours of 7:00 a. m. and midnight of each day. The robbery complained of is alleged to have occurred on December 21, 1923, between the hours of 11 o’clock p. m. and midnight, three days after the policy became effective and one hour before midnight. A jury trial was had which resulted in a verdict…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. The People v. SmallIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Dickirson v. the Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Feder v. Midland Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Moore v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Niagara Fire Insurance v. ForehandIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cox v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  2. Cox v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. of HartfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  3. Oakley Grain & Supply Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API