Legal Opinion

Oakley Grain & Supply Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided April 21, 1959No. Civ. A. No. 2466PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POOS, District Judge.

The plaintiff sues for recovery of loss under a policy of fidelity insurance. Two of the conditions and limitations clauses of the policy are as follows:(1) “Loss shall be covered only if discovered while this insurance is in force or within two years after its termination. The assured shall notify the Company in writing of any loss within fifteen days after discovery thereof, and such notice shall set forth the position of thé Employee and his last known address ; and the assured shall file with the Company a sworn itemized proof of loss within 90 days after the date of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Continental Insurance v. RuckmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Weston v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Buysse v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  4. Hensel v. Capital Live Stock InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920
  5. Phenix Insurance v. Belt Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ace Van & Storage Co., Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  2. Muntwyler v. Ranger InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API