Legal Opinion
Lampard v. Lampard
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 29, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: We reject the contention of plaintiff that reversal is required because Supreme Court failed to set forth the factors it considered and the reasons for its decision in support of its equitable distribution of the parties’ marital property (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [5] [g]). The court’s 21-page decision, including findings of fact and conclusions of law, demonstrates that the court considered the necessary factors and gave the reasons for its decision (see,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Greenwald v. GreenwaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Monette v. MonetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Denholz v. DenholzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Schlosberg v. SchlosbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Smerling v. SmerlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mann v. MannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Cook v. CookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Yunis v. YunisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998