Green v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Judge.
Appellant was convicted by jury of committing sexual abuse in the first degree and sentenced to six years imprisonment. He argues, through new, substituted counsel on appeal, that the trial court erred in (1) overruling his motion for directed verdict, (2) failing to give instructions on certain lesser included offenses, and (3) allowing the prosecuting attorney to make a prejudicial statement in closing argument.
We are unable to reach the merits of appellant’s second and third issues. Regarding the appellant’s second point, he is bereft of his instructions argument because…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Williams v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1979
- Tucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Shrader v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
- Pharo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
- Henry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.