Legal Opinion

Henneberger v. Herman Schwabe, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1968Published

1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Brenner, J.

The architect, Agusta, moves to dismiss the third-party complaint which, broadly read, asserts improper supervisory activities by said architect which induced the defendant owner to wrongfully enter upon and damage the land of plaintiffs, the adjoining owners.

*987The prime complaint alleges that a subcontractor, Caracciolo Construction Company, also hired by the defendant, accompanied the defendant in the improper construction work and wrongful entry. There is thus, preliminarily, little question that the third-party plaintiff is charged with ‘ ‘ affirmative ’ ’ or “active” rather than with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McFall v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Westchester Lighting Co. v. Westchester County Small Estates Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Martin v. Siegfried Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API