Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Deason

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 25, 1921No. 8573PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District' Court, Dallas County; W. F. Whitehurst, Judge. Action by S. Y. Matthews against J. T. Deason and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtTalbot, J.

This is the second appeal in this ease. 200 S. W. 855. The appellant sued originally to compel specific performance of an alleged contract to convey a. lot of land in the city of Dallas and to enjoin the threatened sale thereof by the sheriff of said county. On the former appeal the case was reversed and remanded for a new trial. By a second amended petition filed January 2, 1920, the appellant abandoned his suit for specific performance and now seeks simply to recover damages for alleged breach of contract to convey real property. He alleges in substance that in October, 1914, ap-pellees…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matthews v. DeasonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bradley v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. H. B. Zachry Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1966
  3. Bradley v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API