Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Howell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 3, 1939No. 13945Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

The two outstanding reasons that furnish insurmountable barriers to any re- • covery 'by Howell, as discussed in our original opinion, are:(1) That there never was a contract between Howell and the persons who are joint owners, with R. J. Bradley, in the Gahagen Survey lands. Being under no contractual duty to give Howell a lease on these lands, any one of them could forbid and prevent the delivery of the lease, before it was actually delivered and the proposed purchase price paid. This, some of them did. Their reasons for so doing may not be inquired into or…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Green v. PriddyTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen v. DeeTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Evans v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  4. Burnett v. Continental State Bank of AltoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. T. G. Shaw Oil Corp. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API