Legal Opinion

Carmona v. Wright

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided January 25, 2006No. Civil No. 9:02-CV-884 (GLS)(DEP)PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*272 Memorandum-Decision and Order

GARY L. SHARPE, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Defendants Lester N. Wright et. al. (collectively, “Wright”) object to the refusal of Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles to recommend dismissal of a complaint as a sanction for deposition abuse. See Dkt. Nos. 69 (“Peebles Order”), 70 (Wright Objections); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a); L.R. 72.1(b). Given the dual constraints imposed by Wright’s limited objection and the standard of review, the objection is denied because the Peebles Order is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. However, the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. QBE Insurance v. Jorda Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
  2. Mahoney v. Yamaha Motor Corp. U.S.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  3. Stone v. TrumpDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018
  4. QBE Insurance v. Jorda Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
  5. Wandner v. American AirlinesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API