Cooper v. Driggers
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Littlejohn, Justice:
This is an action for personal injuries sustained when the defendant’s vehicle came in contact with the plaintiff, a pedestrian, in the middle of the highway in the nighttime. It was tried before a jury and resulted in a verdict in favor of the defendant. Plaintiff has appealed. We affirm.
The plaintiff takes ten exceptions to the judge’s charge. Four issues relative to the charge are argued. All other exceptions are deemed abandoned. The main argument is directed to the charge on the law of the doctrine of the last clear chance. This doctrine is not applicable in every…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Rothrock Ex Rel. Estate of Rothrock v. CopelandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Broom Ex Rel. Broom v. Southeastern Highway Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Spahn v. Town of Port RoyalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Jones v. CannerellaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- Brown v. GeorgeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.