Application of Earl E. Folkenroth
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of certain of appellant’s claims, copied from Patent 2,765,685 for “Wire Stripper” in order to provoke an interference. The rejection is on the ground that the claims are not supported by appellant’s disclosure in his application Ser. No. 628,920, filed December 17, 1956, entitled “Insulation Stripping Applicator.” Claims 17-23 were appealed to the board and it allowed claim 23, affirming the examiner as to the rest. On this appeal appellant urges the allow-ability only of claims 18-22.
Ap…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re CrosbyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Annernen v. PennCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
- In re StroedterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
3Cited by2 opinions
- Application of Arthur v. HughesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of Arthur v. HughesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965