Legal Opinion

United States v. One 1939 Plymouth De Luxe Tudor Sedan Automobile

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided October 25, 1945No. 953-Civ-TPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BARKER, District Judge.

The Government filed information-libel for the forfeiture of One 1939 Plymouth DeLuxe Tudor Sedan Automobile; the owner of said automobile, Roy Pope, duly filed his answer to said information-libel, denying that said motor vehicle was subject to forfeiture.

Mason Tison filed a claim to said automobile based upon a mortgage lien which was executed some time prior to said seizure and said Tison posted bond under 18 U.S.C.A. § 646(d), and said automobile was thereupon delivered to him.

The information-libel alleged the existence at a designated place, as well as the seizure…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Price v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  2. United States v. One Kissel Touring AutomobileDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1923
  3. United States v. One Plymouth SedanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. United States v. One Studebaker SedanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. United States v. One 1939 Chevrolet Sedan, Engine No. 2402802District Court, S.D. Florida · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. One 1953 Oldsmobile "88" Two Door SedanDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API