Palmer v. Zaklama
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUCKLEY, J.
Jerry Palmer and Mark Yarber (Palmer and Yarber) bought a house in January of 1993 at a sheriffs sale in Bakersfield. The house was sold to satisfy a $9,000 judgment against the previous owners, Esmat and Selvia Zaklama (the Zaklamas), 1 who by then were living in New Jersey. Pending an appeal from the judgment, the Zaklamas recorded a “Notice of Pending Action,” or lis pendens, against the property. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 405.2.) 2 Shortly afterward, they filed suit against Palmer and Yarber in federal district court in Fresno seeking to set aside the sale, and a petition…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Earp v. NobmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- La Jolla Group II v. BruceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- PARK 100 INVESTMENT GROUP II, LLC v. RyanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Alpha & Omega Development, LP v. Whillock Contracting, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Connelly v. Bornstein, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Paul Bloom v. Robert BeamDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.