Clark v. Roemer
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
JOHN V. PARKER, Chief Judge.
The Supreme Court has held plainly and clearly as to the election of justices of the Louisiana Supreme Court, in Chisom v. Roemer, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2354, 115 L.Ed.2d 348 (1991) that:... Congress made clear that a violation of § 2 could be established by proof of discriminatory results alone. It is difficult to believe that Congress, in an express effort to broaden the protection afforded by the Voting Rights Act, withdrew, without comment, an important category of elections from that protection. Today we reject…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chisom v. RoemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Houston Lawyers' Assn. v. Attorney General of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Albert C. Toney v. N. A. White, United States of America v. Myrtis BishopCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Covington v. North CarolinaDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2017
- Hall v. LouisianaDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2013
- Cousin v. McWherterDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1994
- Lopez v. Monterey County, Cal.District Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Terrebonne Parish Branch Naacp v. JindalDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.