Legal Opinion
Opinion of the Justices
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided May 17, 1977No. 7788PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
To His Excellency the President of the Senate and the Honorable, Council:
The undersigned justices of the supreme court submit the following answers to the questions contained in your resolution adopted May 4,1977, and filed with us on May 5,1977.
Your first question is “Can removal proceedings pursuant to RSA 4:1 take place with four members of the Executive Council sitting instead of the full five-member Executive Council.” The answer to this question is “Yes.” A majority of the Council constitutes a quorum. Opinion of the Justices, 98 N.H. 530, 98 A.2d 635 (1953) ; N.H. Const, pt. II, art.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Van Teslaar v. BenderDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1973
- Browning-Ferris Industries of New Hampshire, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1959
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re GrimmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Keene Publishing Corp. v. Cheshire County Superior CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Colburn v. Personnel CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Downing v. Monitor Publishing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980