Legal Opinion

Dockery v. Cullen & Dykman

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 30, 2000No. 98 CV 7200(NG)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

GERSHON, District Judge.

Pro se plaintiff Algia Dockery commenced this action against defendants to “dismiss” a state court action in which a judgment of foreclosure and sale has been rendered and for punitive damages in the amount of $250,000 for fraud and mental distress. Defendants Greenpoint Savings Bank (“Greenpoint”), its attorneys Cullen and Dykman, Citibank N.A. (“Citibank”), and O.C.I. Mortgage Corporation (“O.C.I.”) have now moved for dismissal on a variety of grounds.

Procedural Background

Plaintiffs complaint makes reference to two separate foreclosure actions commenced by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Stephen Moccio v. New York State Office of Court AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. Ocwen Home Loan ServicingDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
  2. Niles v. Wilshire Investment Group, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  3. MacPherson v. Town of SouthamptonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  4. Barnett v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
  5. Colon v. DavisDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API