Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Petree

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1983No. 18015Published

1DissentHall, Chief Justice

I premise my dissent upon the following time-honored rule of appellate review:

It is the exclusive function of the jury to weigh the evidence and to determine the credibility of the witnesses, and it is not within the prerogative of this Court to substitute its judgment for that of the factfinder.1 [Emphasis added.]

The main opinion reaches a conclusion contrary to that of the jury and trial court by substituting the judgment of this Court, as to the weight and sufficiency of the evidence for that of the jury, in direct contravention of the foregoing.

The standard of review to which this Court…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. McCardellUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. LammUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. RomeroUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Rucker v. DaltonUtah Supreme Court · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API