United States v. Naranjo-Hernandez
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
Defendant-Appellant Juan NaranjoHernandez (Naranjo) appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry following a prior deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. For the first time on appeal, Naranjo argues that the sentencing provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Naranjo acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. DabeitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Fortino Saucedo VillegasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Sanchez-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011