Legal Opinion

United States v. Naranjo-Hernandez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 24, 2005No. 03-41081UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Defendant-Appellant Juan NaranjoHernandez (Naranjo) appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry following a prior deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. For the first time on appeal, Naranjo argues that the sentencing provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Naranjo acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. DabeitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Fortino Saucedo VillegasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Sanchez-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API