Legal Opinion

Rocky Mountain Rhino Lining, Inc. v. Rhino Linings USA, Inc.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 2002No. 00CA0242PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge DAVIDSON.

Defendant, Rhino Linings USA, Inc., appeals from a judgment entered by the trial court in favor of plaintiff, Rocky Mountain Rhino Lining, Inc. Plaintiff cross-appeals from the trial court's assessment of damages. We affirm and remand for an award of fees and costs.

Defendant produces and distributes a polyurethane product known as "Rhino Linings," which typically is used to coat truck beds and other industrial surfaces. Defendant distributes this product through a national network of dealers, advertising such dealerships in magazines, through direct mail, and at…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hall v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. Hamilton Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  3. Tull v. Gundersons, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  4. Dix v. American Bankers Life Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1987
  5. McRae v. BolstadWashington Supreme Court · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Sierra BuildersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  2. Loughridge v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2002
  3. Jones v. Colorado Department of CorrectionsColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Hills v. Westminster Municipal CourtColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Tucker v. Sierra BuildersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API