Rocky Mountain Rhino Lining, Inc. v. Rhino Linings USA, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge DAVIDSON.
Defendant, Rhino Linings USA, Inc., appeals from a judgment entered by the trial court in favor of plaintiff, Rocky Mountain Rhino Lining, Inc. Plaintiff cross-appeals from the trial court's assessment of damages. We affirm and remand for an award of fees and costs.
Defendant produces and distributes a polyurethane product known as "Rhino Linings," which typically is used to coat truck beds and other industrial surfaces. Defendant distributes this product through a national network of dealers, advertising such dealerships in magazines, through direct mail, and at…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hall v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Hamilton Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Tull v. Gundersons, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Dix v. American Bankers Life Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1987
- McRae v. BolstadWashington Supreme Court · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tucker v. Sierra BuildersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- Loughridge v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2002
- Jones v. Colorado Department of CorrectionsColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- Hills v. Westminster Municipal CourtColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Tucker v. Sierra BuildersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005