Legal Opinion

Black v. Spears

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1920No. Docket No. 16PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Tuscola; Beach (Watson), J, Case by George V. Black against William J. Spears and Anna H. Spears for a wrongful seizure of a stock of merchandise under a writ of attachment. Judgment for defendants on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

On Rehearing.

Pee Curiam.

Further consideration of this case, following a re-argument, convinces the court that the opinion as filed should be modified in two particulars. A perusal of that opinion shows that the writer indicated that there were two questions for determination : First, whether the court was in error in holding that recovery under the first count was barred by reason of the adjudication in the case of Spears v. Black, 190 Mich. 693; and, second, whether the court was in error in holding that recovery under the second and third counts was barred by the statute of limitations.

In…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Spears v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fellows v. National Can Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API