Legal Opinion
Perrin v. Kitzhaber
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 21, 2004No. 0107-07021, 0107-07120; A118103PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
In these consolidated actions involving redistricting of Oregon’s congressional districts, plaintiffs Cheryl Perrin, Charles P. Duffy, and David W. Sherman (the Perrin plaintiffs), Jason Atkinson, Roger Beyer, William Fisher, John Minnis, Charles Starr, and the Oregon Republican Party (the Atkinson plaintiffs), and intervenors Kate Brown and Dan Gardner all appeal, challenging the trial court’s refusal to award them attorney fees and costs pursuant to 42 USC section 1988. The trial court denied attorney fees and concluded that (1) the Atkinson plaintiffs had not “prevailed”; and (2) the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Favors v. DraytonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Theresa Norelli & a. v. Secretary of State & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2022