Legal Opinion

Ammon v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1988No. A043068PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POLLAK, J. *

This petition for writ of mandate presents the as-yet unanswered question whether section 411.30 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1 requires that the attorney’s certificate of merit which must be filed in a malpractice action against a health care provider must reflect that plaintiff’s counsel has consulted with a professional licensed in the same discipline as the defendant. The trial court, in overruling the petitioner’s demurrer, implicitly held that it is sufficient if the certificate shows that the attorney has consulted with an expert licensed in any of the four…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Brown v. ColmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Strauch v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. People v. FowlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Agnew v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Irwin Memorial Blood BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Avivi v. Centro Medico Urgente Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Enslen v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. AA MECHANICAL v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. AA MECHANICAL v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API