Legal Opinion

State v. Kent

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided August 29, 1979No. 63723PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

371 So.2d 1319 (1979)

STATE of Louisiana

v.

John Norman KENT.[*]

No. 63723.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 21, 1979.

Dissenting Opinion August 29, 1979.

Charles R. Moore, Edward J. Walters, Jr., Moore & Walters, Baton Rouge, for defendant-respondent.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ossie B. Brown, Dist. Atty., Premila Burns Chumbley, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-relator.

CALOGERO, Justice.

We granted the state's writ application seeking review of the trial court's determination that defendant's confessions are inadmissible for all purposes. 366 So.2d 907…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  2. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  3. State v. KellerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  4. State v. GoodmonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. YoungWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API