Legal Opinion
Griffith v. Sandler
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 11, 1953No. 1367PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Appellants Griffith sued Bernard and Bertha Goldberg and Jacob Sandler for alleged abuse of civil process. Sandler moved to dismiss on the ground that with respect to him the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. This appeal is from an order granting his motion to dismiss.
Although not raised by appellee, we are confronted with the question of the ap-pealability of the order. Municipal Court rule 54(b), substantially the same as Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b), 28 U.S.C.A., provides that, when more than one claim for relief is presented in an action,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Felder v. D. Loughran Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Silverstein v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dyhouse v. BaylorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Dixon v. AM General Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Artis-Bey v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Riddick v. William M. Sinclair Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Paden v. GallowayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988