Wirth v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
ERROR to the Municipal Court of MiVwcmhee County. The plaintiff in error was convicted of an offense under sec. 4605, R. S. The facts will sufficiently appear from the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtOetoN, J.
The information charges the defendant with being the owner of a certain horse affected by an infectious disease, to wit influenza, and with having kept the said horse in a place where other animals, to wit horses, could have access to and become infected by said horse, he then well knowing the said horse to be so affected by the infectious disease aforesaid. The information describes the offense in the language of the statute (sec. 4605, R. S.), and sufficiently indicates the facts necessary to be proved in order to sustain it. It must be proved (1) that the defendant was the owner of a horse…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Maria Cardwell Tomlin, and Christine Williams Harrell v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Adams Express Co. v. HeagyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919