Legal Opinion

Menard v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided February 9, 2006No. 01-04-01207-CRPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JANE BLAND, Justice.

A jury found appellant, John Charles Menard, guilty of aggravated robbery. 1 After finding two enhancement paragraphs true, the jury assessed punishment at thirty-six years’ confinement. Menard contends the trial court abused its discretion in failing to excuse a juror during deliberations, depriving him of his (1) Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process; (2) Sixth Amendment right to a trial by a fair and impartial jury; and (3) Texas constitutional rights to a fair and impartial jury and to due course of law. We hold that the issue is waived because…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. United States v. Georgia R. FreitagCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. Trout v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Thieleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  5. Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Drew Ryser v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
  2. Castillo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  3. Glen Tate v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
  4. Kimberly Clark Saenz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
  5. Adam Lee Castillo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API