Menard v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JANE BLAND, Justice.
A jury found appellant, John Charles Menard, guilty of aggravated robbery. 1 After finding two enhancement paragraphs true, the jury assessed punishment at thirty-six years’ confinement. Menard contends the trial court abused its discretion in failing to excuse a juror during deliberations, depriving him of his (1) Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process; (2) Sixth Amendment right to a trial by a fair and impartial jury; and (3) Texas constitutional rights to a fair and impartial jury and to due course of law. We hold that the issue is waived because…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- United States v. Georgia R. FreitagCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Trout v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Thieleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Drew Ryser v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
- Castillo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
- Glen Tate v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
- Kimberly Clark Saenz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
- Adam Lee Castillo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.