Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Woods v. Vann

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 28, 1926No. 16901PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Mayes county, in which the court found one Rosa Smith died about March 1. 1915, seised of certain lands; that George Vann was her “lawful surviving husband, and as such succeeded to the ownership of an undivided one-third interest in and .to the lands of Rosa Smith, and George Vann had conveyed an undivided one-half of his interests to R. M. Mountcastle and Q. D. Boydston. The court further found that on November 23, 1917, one Hardy Smith and Es-’ sip Smith, his wife, executed a certain note and mortgage to J. F.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Greer v. McNealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  2. Conwill v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Gray v. McKnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. In Re Estate of BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BrunerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gassin v. McJunkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. National Exploration Co. v. RobinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Bradburn v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  4. Flynn v. VandersliceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Anderson v. MaloneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API