Legal Opinion

Boehm v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1905No. Docket No. 37PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Case by Gordon E. J. Boehm, by next friend, against the city of Detroit for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

The plaintiff, an infant, brought suit, by his next friend, against the city of Detroit for injuries alleged to have been received on the night of August 14, 1901, through a defective sidewalk. At the time of the accident the plaintiff was a little over four years old, and was walking over the sidewalk in question between his father and mother; his father holding him by the left hand. As they were going along, the child stepped into a hole in the sidewalk and fell with considerable force against his father. Plaintiff alleges in his declaration that by reason of this fall—

“ The muscles,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shippy v. Village of Au SableMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Mullen v. City of OwossoMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Bush v. St. Joseph & Benton Harbor Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Haft v. Lone Palm HotelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Love v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Tyler v. WeedMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Hackney v. ElliottNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Butler v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API