Legal Opinion

Harold Kaufman v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 18, 1965No. 17834PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKMUN, Circuit Judge.

Harold Kaufman, upon his plea of not guilty, was convicted by a jury of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a) and (d). His sole defense was insanity at the time of the crime. His motions for acquittal made at the close of all the evidence and for a new trial were denied by Judge Regan. A sentence of 20 years was imposed. Kaufman appeals in forma pauperis.

Counsel for the defendant was appointed by the trial court. Promptly after the indictment was returned, the defense filed a motion under 18 U.S.C. § 4244 for the determination of Kaufman’s mental competency…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spano v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Coplon v. United States (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kaufman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Duane Earl Pope v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  3. Steven Levine v. Chief Justice Nathan S. Heffernan, and State Bar of Wisconsin and Stephen L. SmayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. George M. Bradley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  5. Charles Lee Mason v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API