Legal Opinion

Yalem v. Yalem

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 26, 1990No. 58259PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMM, Judge.

This is a case of first impression in Missouri. The question presented is whether a trial court has jurisdiction to hear a contempt motion involving a subsequent act of contempt while a judgment for the previous act of contempt is pending on appeal. We hold that it does and affirm.

The parties do not question our jurisdiction. We ’ have jurisdiction, because the contemnor contests the trial court’s jurisdiction to hear the motion for contempt although no enforcement order has been issued. Cooper v. Cooper, 778 S.W.2d 694, 697 (Mo.App.E.D.1989).

I. Background Facts

In their 1988…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Steckler v. StecklerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. State ex rel. Brooks Erection & Construction Co. v. GaertnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Cooper v. CooperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Yalem v. YalemMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. McNeill v. McNeillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Russell v. Kerry, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Yalem v. YalemMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API