Legal Opinion

People v. Silinsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 13, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerrell, J.

The indictment against the defendants charged that the defendants, on September 11, 1930, in the county of New York, did buy, receive, conceal and withhold, knowing the same to have been stolen, the following stocks: 270 shares of British Type Investors; 20 shares of North American; 20 shares of United States Financial; 50 shares of Dixton, Inc.; 500 shares of Ardsley Butte Corporation; and 35 shares of Maxwell Corporation, which said *290stocks belonged to and had been recently stolen from one Franz W. Dumig. In dismissing the indictment the justice presiding at General Sessions rendered a brief…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. . GalboNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. People of the State of New York v. . DowlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. People v. RoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  4. People v. NelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. PeetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. People v. SobinNew York Court of Special Session · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API