Legal Opinion
Adams v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided November 13, 1990No. Nos. 90-162C, 90-183C, 90-195C, 90-207C, 90-226C, 90-251C, 90-274C, 90-281C, 90-313C, 90-319C, 90-332C, 90-342C, 90-365C, 90-366C, 90-396C, 90-397C, 90-404C, 90-405C, 90-448C, 90-457C, 90-458C, 90-510C, 90-525C, 90-526C, 90-533C, 90-632C to 90-636C and 90-638CPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This action is pending on plaintiffs’ motion to compel discovery. Based on the written and oral argument, and for the reasons expressed herein, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiffs in these consolidated actions are over 4,000 present or former Special Agents in Series 1811 positions. Because the issue of relevance surfaces in connection with the following discussion, the court notes that the complaint advances four grounds for liability. The first is that those plaintiffs holding positions at GS-9 or above were improperly treated as exempt from…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Walling v. General Industries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Carter v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- The United States v. Lester CookCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- George D. Mitchell, Jr., and (Mrs.) Jodie Mitchell v. Benjamin F. Williams, D/B/A Williams Funeral Home, Fordyce and Camden, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Abreu v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991