Legal Opinion

Haney v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 17, 1918No. 9971PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; Mark L. Bozarth, Judge. Action by Emma Haney and others against Albert Anderson and others. Demurrer to petition sustained, and plaintiffs bring error»

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, J.

Emma Haney, Lumsey Deere, Amie Deere, and Kelly Deere, by C. O. White, guardian, and Sumsey Deere, Bama Bear, and Sallie Hill, by John Hill, guardian, as plaintiffs, instituted this action in the district court of Okmulgee county, against the defendants, Albert Anderson, Henry Barney, Charles E. Meyers, Robert Kelly, and Sukey Kelly, to recover a tract of land in said county, to which petition defendants demurred, and, the demurrer having been sustained by the trial court this proceeding in error was commenced to reverse said order.

The land in controversy is the allotment of one Isaac Deere,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. De Graffenreid v. Iowa Land & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Wesley v. DiamondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Barnett v. WaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Irving v. DiamondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Scott v. JacobsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bilby v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Johnson v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Kelly v. McRaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API