Legal Opinion

United States v. Rinkes

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided July 11, 2000No. NMCM 20000264PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeCICCO, Chief Judge:

In this case, we hold that the offenses of taking indecent liberties with a child and indecent exposure are neither multiplicious, nor do they, under the facts of this case, constitute an unreasonable multiplication of charges.

Petty Officer Rinkes pleaded guilty at a special court-martial to both taking indecent liberties with a child and indecent exposure under Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. During the providence inquiry, he stated that while in the bedroom of his government-assigned quarters at the Naval Submarine Base at Kings Bay,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. TetersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  5. United States v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. LabeanU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
  2. United States v. AbbottNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
  3. United States v. LabeanU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API