United States v. Rinkes
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DeCICCO, Chief Judge:
In this case, we hold that the offenses of taking indecent liberties with a child and indecent exposure are neither multiplicious, nor do they, under the facts of this case, constitute an unreasonable multiplication of charges.
Petty Officer Rinkes pleaded guilty at a special court-martial to both taking indecent liberties with a child and indecent exposure under Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. During the providence inquiry, he stated that while in the bedroom of his government-assigned quarters at the Naval Submarine Base at Kings Bay,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. TetersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. LabeanU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- United States v. AbbottNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
- United States v. LabeanU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001