Legal Opinion

West v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 20, 1966No. [App. No. 9, September Term, 1966.]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Applicant was convicted of breaking and entering, and larceny in November of 1963, and was sentenced to five years’ confinement. While still an inmate of a state penal institution, .he was tried by Judge Childs and a jury and found to be a defective delinquent.

He raises six questions: (1) that his “statutory right” to a prompt hearing was violated; (2) that the delay deprived him of his right to a parole hearing; (3) that his defective-delinquent hearing should not have been heard because a habeas corpus petition was pending; (4) the same as (3) although couched in different terms; (5) that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCloskey v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. Alt v. DirectorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Daugherty v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams & Fulwood v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Kroneburg v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. Miller v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  4. Williams & Fulwood v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API